Extraction Practicum of Science Laboratory 2 - IPSE FPMIPA UPI Assignment
Science Laboratory 2
Extraction Practicum
A. Date : October 9, 2017
B. Tittle : Extraction
C. Objective : To
determine the solubility of solvent in extraction process
D. Basic
Theory
Most chemical reactions show poor
selectivity as the types of metal ions that take part. To improve the
selectivity, it is common to resort to extraction methods. Solutes have
different solubilises in different solvents, and the process of selectively
removing a solute from a mixture with a solvent is called extraction. The
solute to be extracted may be in a solid or in a liquid medium, and the solvent
which is used for the extraction process may be water, a water-miscible
solvent, or a water-immiscible solvent. The selection of the solvent to be used
depends upon the solute and upon the requirements of the experimental
procedure. An ideal extraction method should be rapid, simple, and inexpensive
to perform; should yield quantitative recovery of target being analysed without
loss or degradation; and should yield that is immediately ready for analysis
without additional concentration or class fractionation steps. (Patnaik, 1995)
A simple extraction is often used in the
work-up of an organic reaction mixture, but extraction can be used to separate
and purify organic compounds. Extraction is particularly useful in the
separation of acidic and basic components from an organic mixture by their
reaction with dilute aqueous base or acid as appropriate. Since this relies on
an acid-alkaline chemical reaction, the technique often called chemically active
extraction. Whatever extraction protocol is being used, most extraction
operations in the organic chemistry laboratory are carried out in separator
funnels.
When an organic compound, X, is placed in a separator funnel with two immiscible liquids, such as water and chloroform, some of compound will dissolved in the water and some in the chloroform. In more technical language, the compound is said to partition or distribute itself between the two liquids, and the exact amount of X in each place phase clearly depends on its relative solubility in water and chloroform. The ratio of the concentration of X in each phase is known as the partition coefficient or distribution coefficient. (Cranwell, 2017)
E.
Materials and Equipments
1.
Materials :
1. Iodium (solid)
2. Chloroform
3. Distilled
Water
4.
Equipments :
1.
Balance
(1 set)
2.
Watch glass (1)
3.
Iron ring (1)
4.
Beaker glass 250 mL (2)
5.
Graduated cylinder 200 mL
(1)
6.
Stand (1)
7.
Spatula (1)
8.
Stirring rod (1)
9.
Separator funnel (1)
10. Aquadest
bottle (1)
11. Pipette (1)
F. Observation Table
No |
Procedure |
Observation |
1. |
Separation of camphor ( C10H16O
) from contaminator Ø Contaminated camphor powder is weighted by using balance
and watch glass
Ø The contaminated camphor powder is placed in 100 mL
beaker glass by using spatula
Ø 50 mL of water are added into 100 mL round-bottom
flask by using aquadest bottle
Ø Beaker glass is placed on the wire gauze which
already placed set up on the tripod
Ø Bunsen burner is placed in the centre of tripod
Ø 100 mL round-bottom flask filled with 50 mL of water
is placed on the surface of 100 mL beaker glass until the beaker glass’
surface is covered
Ø The holes around the outer circle of beaker glass
are plugged by aluminium foil
Ø The bunsen
burner is turned on by using matches and set up to be small fire
Ø The fire is turned off and round-bottom flask is
picked up by using tissue
Ø The crystals are collected by using spatula, placed
on watch glass, and weighted by using balance
|
·
1 gram of
contaminated camphor powder ·
The initial
colour of contaminated camphor powder is black
·
Its colour is
still black
·
The
temperature of water is in room temperature
·
The
contaminated camphor powder get burn ·
The colour of
powder slowly turn white ·
By time, the
bottom of the flask has visually something like dew ·
The colour of
substance in beaker glass turns black again
·
There are some
crystals on the bottom of the flask ·
The colour of
crystals is white ·
The colour of
substance in beaker glass is black burnt ·
The colour of
water is still colourless and the temperature is a bit warmer
·
0.126 gram of
crystal gotten ·
The shape of
crystals is star look alike
|
G.
Analysis
Data and Discussion
Ø Analysis data
At
first, we do the calculation to determine mass of crystal and mass of the black
substance:
Known:
Initial
mass of contaminated powder: 1 gram
Mass
of crystal: 0.216 gram
Question:
Mass of the black substance?
Answer:
Initial
mass of contaminated camphor powder = Mass of crystal + Mass of the black
substance
1
gram = 0.216 gram + x
X
= 1 gram – 0.216 gram
= 0.784 gram = Mass of black substance
So, the mass of black substance left in beaker glass is 0.784 gram.
Ø Discussion
The black substance which had been
mentioned above is carbon and mixed with the pure camphor that has original
colour of crystal white. Carbon and camphor may have different vapour pressure
which camphor has lower vapour pressure than carbon, so the camphor could
sublimate and separate from the contaminator, carbon, or residue and becomes
pure camphor (the crystal).
After measurement, we got 0.216 gram
of crystal or pure camphor. Because we don’t do the measurement for the residue
to make sure the mass of it due to limited time and number of balance set, we
just do the math to determine the mass of carbon or residue. It is quite
confused and insecure at first because we don’t know the ratio of carbon and
pure camphor before mixed. So, it is a bit hard to know if the result of
crystal is in normal or expected mass of crystal after the experiment. But, at
least, we can assume by the colour of initial powder which is visually almost
completely black, so the carbon is much more than pure camphor and it can make
the gotten result of crystal’s mass and the mass of residue just right and
reliable.
And also, not just because we didn’t
actually do the real measurement using balance to determine the mass of
residue, the less mass of crystal can be predicted occur because we picked up
the flask three times to see if the sublimation had already started and checked
the amount of crystal on the bottom of flask to see if the sublimation had
stopped which could be known if there were no addition of crystal from the
amount of crystal since the last checked up. The repeated pick up during the
heating may influence the amount of crystal in the end. Because since the holes
are covered by the aluminium to prevent any heat flowing out the system which
can impact factors such as temperature, vapour pressure, and possibility of sublimation,
the repeated pick up might also cause the heat flowing out and influence
temperature which impact pressure which impact the possibility of sublimation.
Because if we want higher possibility of sublimation, we should have high
temperature to get high pressure. And the repeated pick up cause the substance
couldn’t get maximum heat to do maximum sublimation and this analysis can be
the fact of why we got few amount of crystal or pure camphor.
And for the water in round-bottom
flask, because we didn’t use thermometer, then we assumed that initial
temperature of water followed the room temperature. And because we also didn’t
use thermometer to measure the temperature of water after heating. It just can
be known by touch. When picking up the flask which made of glass, the flask was
felt warmer because of the heating and it can be assumed that so was the water.
H.
Conclusion
After all, we can conclude that
sublimation technique can be used as the method to separate impurity mixture
and in the experiment, we get 0.216 gram of crystal or pure camphor and 0.784
gram of contaminator or residue or carbon. This technique is quite simple to
applied and give good experimentally result of pure substances as expectation
based on either theoretically or formulated calculation.
I. References
Furniss, B.S, Hannaford, A.J, Smith, PWG, and Tatchell, A.R.
(1989). Vogel's textbook of Practical
Organic Compound. Longman Group: UK
A.Holden,
Claire, and Howard S. Bryant. (1968). Purification
by Sublimation. Taylor &
Francis Group: England
0 Response to "Extraction Practicum of Science Laboratory 2 - IPSE FPMIPA UPI Assignment"
Posting Komentar